Wednesday, May 31, 2006

James Madison Didn't Support the Troops


Mr. Chairman, I most cordially agree, with the honorable member last up, that a standing army is one of the greatest mischiefs that can possibly happen. It is a great recommendation for this system, that it provides against this evil more than any other system known to us, and, particularly, more than the old system of confederation. The most effectual way to guard against a standing army, is to render it unnecessary. The most effectual way to render it unnecessary, is to give the general government full power to call forth the militia, and exert the whole natural strength of the Union, when necessary. Thus you will furnish the people with sure and certain protection, without recurring to this evil.


— James Madison, 06/14/1788, Virginia Ratifying Convention.

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Stay Away

Dear Friends,

You probably don't need this kind of encouragement, but don't bother checking in until Tuesday, May 16th.

The entire staff of the Swill is currently on a corporate retreat; not only are we engaged in all types of ropes-courses and cerebral team-building exercises, we are conducting research for our upcoming series on things that made Milwaukee famous, but that may or may not hav e made a loser out of us.

yrs
The Swill

Sunday, May 07, 2006

Upon Making Fun of President Asshole

History has not revealed a deeper irony than the destruction of the spirit of democratic liberty in the name of devotion to it, which we have witnessed in this nation in the past five years.

In this situation, appeal to the courts is of less moment than individual courage in every relationship of life. What is wanted is the courage and the ability to resist the tide, to fashion satirical weapons against the demagogues, to defeat the fools with the weapons of both scorn and laughter.
- Reinhold Niebuhr, 1952

Friday, May 05, 2006

Who Was Never Called What?

Please go to google, type the word "asshole" and hit the "I'm feeling lucky" button. Make sure your sound is on.

Thanks to JST for this one.

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Things Lighthearted

Dear friends, you know that we have a wide variety of interests here: when you tune in, you expect to be regaled with reflections upon everything from wainscoting to handwoven tweeds, frothy pints of Kentish ale to untranslatable passages from Juvenal. We love it all, and we love you for loving it with us.

If in recent days we have become unattractively petulant, perhaps even abusive -- to you, of all people -- we apologize, and after a few brief moments of housecleaning we promise you nothing less than useful advice of a cheerful nature. In order to get the predictable business out of the way as quickly and efficiently as possible, we're going to abandon our usual lambent prose and just get right to the fucking points.

Item:
Upon learning that Z. Moussaoui will get no Texas justice, and will instead spend the rest of his life in prison, Dubya announces that "Evil will not have the final say."

If he's right, we only hope that the final say will go to Stephen Colbert, who actually and thankfully wasn't funny at all: I'm still waiting for somebody to tell me just what the fuck is so risible about secret prisons, torture, global climate change, and a foreign policy based entirely on greed, photo-ops and depleted uranium.

Evil was unavailable for comment.

Item:
A 19-year old Harvard student plagiarizes her novel, the plot of which concerns a young woman's triumphant admission to Harvard, after learning that what she really needed to do was loosen up, get frisky, and have some fun.

First of all, we believe we're the first to note that this was also roughly the plot of Risky Business, wherein a wealthy kid from a good school gets into Princeton only after learning that Ivy League admissions respond better to blow jobs than they do to SAT scores. (Apparently admissions officers also respond to rich kids who hire expensive admissions consultants after not attending public school but rather "Public" school in a cool Scottish way, which is how Kaavya Viswanathan got in, but that's for another post).

Yes, she plagiarized passages such as these (no, we're not going to cite where we got this comparison, because we're metaplagiarizing):

From Megan McCafferty's Sloppy Firsts: "Sabrina was the brainy Angel. Yet another example of how every girl had to be one or the other: Pretty or smart."

From Miss Viswanathan's book: "Moneypenny was the brainy female character. Yet another example of how every girl had to be one or the other: smart or pretty."

Seriously, does this sort of thing trouble you? Are you worried about what kind of message this situation sends to America's youth? Do you think it suggests a certain moral or intellectual decline?

Because if you do, you're a fucking idiot.

You're a fucking idiot like the Harvard undergraduates who flooded the Crimson with letters pointing out that Viswanathan also lifted passages from The Princess Diaries. What's offends us is not that a 19-year old would plagiarize -- god forbid we were ever held responsible for what we did in our 19th year -- but that America's putative academic elite have memorized a novel that our ten-year old niece recently described as "too simple to be interesting" (true story, we kid you fucking not, etc.).

Want your kids to enjoy an inspiring bit of realism that carries a useful lesson? Tell them that by virtue of the fact that they're your kids born into your family in your class, they've already missed out on all the statistically significant ways of getting into a first-tier private university. If that depresses them, just point out that society will probably collapse before they would have had a chance to matriculate.

Okay, friends, having wiped that out of the literal cracks in our figurative floor, we have our first installment of a series (nota bene, we've abandoned our idea for a Baedeker to American Paleoconservatism: we realized a few days ago that the project was starting to feel dangerously like work). This week?

Liquor One Can't Afford Not To Buy

Say it with us, friends: The Grand Macnish.

A Scotch whisky that has been distilled continuously since 1863, but that is (much more significantly) to be found in your local CVS pharmacy, and never for more than $7.99 per 750 ml bottle. It's warm, well integrated, a classic Highland malt that requires neither branch water nor ice nor stockbroker for full enjoyment. Toffee and leather on the nose, hints of heather and lilac on the finish.

Ever wonder how Dewar's might taste if they didn't spend all their money on full-page ads in Maxim? Ever suspect that collie-piss Glenfiddich was expensive Scottish revenge on Americans who turned tartans into comfortor covers? Ever have only $8 in your pocket but a rather more refined palate than you thought satisfiable for under a sawbuck? Here you go.

Tell 'em the Swill sent you (purely figurative, we're not guerrilla marketers or anything).

Upon Agreement

It may be self-loathing that makes a thug, but it's a numb smile that pisses him off.
-- Leo Kottke

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

De Rerum Fartura


Our title today is a thickly veiled threat to those who mistakenly believe that deep-fried Swill is available upon demand. More than just a cheap philosophical pun, we hope that the phrase evokes a faint whiff of internal corruption, a pungent and nonmetaphorically flatulent reply to any and all who arrive here seeking -- of all things -- service.

The Swill may be quotidian, but is rarely daily. Translatio? A figurative fart upon thee, impatient reader, for we are neither fast nor food.

The canines of northern Europe, however, cannot say as much.

Unlike our own reasty riposte to the hurry-upniks, the rotten stench in the state of Denmark turns out to be resolutely literal: it is the bouquet of undigested kibble emanating from the Royal Underbelly itself. Brace yourselves: while the American news media is once again silent on a major issue of international importance, Der Spiegel is reporting that Henrik, Prince Consort of Denmark / Husband of Queen Margrethe II, enjoys the taste of roasted dog flesh.

Long the staple of smug slurs against the good people of Korea, caninophagia has been out of fashion in Europe for some time. Horse and donkey, of course, remain fare game: we know a place in Verona that serves a truly tantalizing pastissada (recommended wine: Amarone), and we have chewed on salami d'asino in a Piedmontese market (try it with Barbera). We know that the Belgians like their tartare de cheval, and more affluent diners should sample sakuranabe while in Tokyo.

But dogs? Not so much. In England, after all, dogs (and horses, for that matter) enjoyed legal protection against abuse some decade before children did. We are accordingly unsurprised that Danish animal lovers are aghast at the prospect of their queen being kissed with the same lips that smack over greasy Fido bits, not least because Prince Henrik is past president of a national Dachsund Society.

Perhaps you're outraged too, dear reader, but come on. No matter what your stance on this issue -- Peter Singer, we know you're out there -- one must give the Prince mad-ass props for his admirably practical, seemingly unironic, and perhaps typically Scandinavian assessment of the issue: "Das ist genauso wie mit Hühnchen."

Yes, dear Friends, as if you needed a member of the Royal Family to confirm what you always suspected: Dachsund does indeed taste like chicken.